Portfolio management

Software quality is a value creation lever.
CodeDD helps you improve it.

Automated, continuous monitoring of software risk across your portfolio – so you can drive technical improvement, reduce risk, and build a stronger valuation story from acquisition to exit.

You manage financial, operational, and commercial performance.
The technology layer is harder to see.

Software quality is rarely tracked with the same rigour as financial or sales performance. That gap creates risk across the holding period and at exit.

Technical debt accumulates silently

Debt compounds unchecked without visibility, consuming engineering capacity and slowing development.

Capital allocation is hard to verify

Is engineering investment driving growth or maintaining legacy code? Without data, you cannot know.

Key person risk goes unquantified

Core IP in the hands of one or two developers won't show up on a financial report – until it's too late.

Exit surprises erode valuation

Debt and security gaps found during buyer diligence leave no time to fix what should have been caught earlier.

A continuous view of technical quality – across every portco, across the full holding period.

CodeDD automates the analysis of software quality, security, and technical debt – translating engineering complexity into clear metrics you can track, improve, and report on at board level.

01

Establish a baseline at acquisition

Full codebase analysis within 24 hours. Understand code quality, security posture, debt load, and key person risk before the improvement programme begins.

02

Drive improvement through the holding period

Track technical metrics quarter on quarter. Prioritise remediation and hold management accountable with objective data – not management reporting.

03

Exit with an evidenced improvement story

Documented, quarter-on-quarter evidence of technical improvement. Reduce buyer friction, support valuation, and answer technical DD questions with confidence.

Board-ready metrics across the technology layer.

Every CodeDD output is designed for a portfolio manager, not a developer. Add technical performance alongside financial and commercial metrics in your quarterly board pack.

Improve

Code quality and technical debt

Remediation cost tracked in real terms – one-time cost, hours, and annual overhead. Reduce it systematically over the holding period.

Increase

Innovation rate

New capability vs. maintenance spend, measured objectively. A rising rate shows capital is fuelling growth, not the past.

Reduce

Key person risk

Contributor concentration mapped across the full codebase. Track risk reduction as the team scales.

Strengthen

Security posture

Vulnerabilities and dependencies tracked continuously. Arrive at exit with a clean, defensible security record.

Drive

Remediation prioritisation

Highest-impact fixes surfaced first – so engineering effort goes where it improves valuation most.

Build

Exit-ready documentation

A quarter-on-quarter improvement record that gives buyers confidence and sellers the evidence to defend valuation.

PortfolioStartup A
Last audit: 3 days ago
Medium
12.3%
Technical Debt
$127,400 remediation cost
-2.1% from last quarter
High Risk
47%
Key Person Risk
Top dev owns 47% of core IP
Bus Factor: 2
Good Balance
62%
Innovation
38%
Maintenance
Capital fueling growth
+18% from last quarter
3 Critical CVEs
3 / 12
Security & IP
3 critical, 9 high vulnerabilities
Avg age: 23 days

Built for investors, not developers.

CodeDD is used by PE teams and advisors across buy-side diligence, portfolio monitoring, and sell-side preparation.

100%
Full codebase coverage – not sample-based
70%
Reduction in expert review time – EY
0
Engineering time required to get started

CodeDD transformed our technical due diligence process. By providing a simple way in to software due diligence, we can now focus on the real work of investing.

Ari TatosManaging Partner, Stone Hedge Flemming

Know the technical state of every asset in your portfolio

Every metric comes with detailed insights, visualizations, and actionable recommendations. Drill down from executive summaries to file-level details in seconds.

73/ 100

Overall Health Score

Composite score based on code quality, security, test coverage, and maintenance indicators

Remediation Cost$127,400One-time investment
Estimated Time156 days1,248 developer hours
Annual Interest$23,1005.4 hours/week overhead

Health Score Components

Overall score of 73/100 is weighted from four key factors:

Code Quality40% weight · Contributes 29 pts
73/100
Average technical debt score: 73%
Based on file-level maintainability and complexity analysis
Security & Dependencies30% weight · Contributes 24 pts
81/100
12 weighted vulnerabilities
Test Coverage20% weight · Contributes 13 pts
64/100
Current coverage: 64.2%
Missing coverage: 35.8%
Maintenance Indicators10% weight · Contributes 7 pts
68/100
14 validated security flags
Version lag and maintenance issues detected

Start improving the technology layer across your portfolio.

Run a free audit across of one of your portfolio companies and see exactly what CodeDD surfaces – in 24 hours.